Ex Parte Albaugh et al - Page 1



                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered                               
                                 today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   


                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                 __________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                 __________                                                     
                   Ex parte VIRGIL A. ALBAUGH, MESSAOUD BENANTAR, PHILIP                                        
                        YEN-TANG CHANG, and HARI HARANATH MADDURI                                               
                                                 __________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-1403                                                  
                                           Application 10/226,966                                               
                                           Technology Center 2100                                               
                                                 __________                                                     
                                          Decided: August 15, 2007                                              
                                                 __________                                                     


                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and ROBERT E.                                       
                NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                            
                THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This appeal involves claims 1, 3 through 11, 13 through 21, and 23                       
                through 33.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).                           






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013