The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DAVID H. HAYNES
__________
Appeal 2007-1406
Application 09/910,970
Technology Center 2600
__________
Decided: September 6, 2007
__________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-35.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b). We REVERSE.
1 Appellant has withdrawn claim 21 from consideration in this appeal (Br.
2). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as to claim 21. Appellant cancelled
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013