The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YEVGENIY EUGENE SHTEYN
____________
Appeal 2007-1407
Application 09/823,141
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: June 29, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and HOWARD B.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Shteyn (Appellant) appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 1, 3 through 6, and 10 through 18,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Appellant's invention relates to a task management system in which
the movement of an object is monitored, and a reminder message to move
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013