Ex Parte MacKey - Page 8

                Appeal 2007-1430                                                                                   
                Application 10/407,696                                                                             

                       37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) provides "[a] new ground of rejection pursuant                         
                to this paragraph shall not be considered final for judicial review."                              
                       37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) also provides that Appellant, WITHIN TWO                               
                MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of                                         
                the following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection to                           
                avoid termination of the appeal as to the rejected claims:                                         
                              (1) Reopen prosecution.  Submit an appropriate                                       
                       amendment of the claims so rejected or new evidence relating                                
                       to the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                                     
                       reconsidered by the Examiner, in which event the proceeding                                 
                       will be remanded to the Examiner. . . .                                                     
                              (2) Request rehearing.  Request that the proceeding be                               
                       reheard under § 41.52 by the Board upon the same record. . . .                              
                       Should Appellant elect to prosecute further before the Examiner                             
                pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b)(1), in order to preserve the right to seek                        
                review under 35 U.S.C. §§ 141 or 145 with respect to the affirmed rejection,                       
                the effective date of the affirmance is deferred until conclusion of the                           
                prosecution before the Examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited                          
                prosecution, the affirmed rejection is overcome.                                                   
                       If Appellant elects prosecution before the Examiner and this does not                       
                result in allowance of the application, abandonment or a second appeal, this                       
                case should be returned to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences for                       
                final action on the affirmed rejection, including any timely request for                           
                rehearing thereof.                                                                                 





                                                        8                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013