1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
2 not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
11 Ex parte JACOB SVENDENUIS, PETER NILSSON, and OLA NOCKHAMMAR
12
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2007-1454
16 Application No. 11/088,528
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: August 3, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and MURRIEL E.
23
23 CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30
31 STATEMENT OF THE CASE
32
33 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-48. These are the only
34 claims in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 6(a).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013