onecle

Ex Parte Honda - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Ex parte SHO HONDA                                                 
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1459                                                
                                          Application 10/204,413                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 25, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and JENNIFER                                     
                D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      This appeal involves claims 8-12.  Claims 1-7 have been allowed.  We                   
                have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6(b) and 134.                     







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013