Ex Parte Farcot et al - Page 12



            Appeal 2007-1463                                                     Page 12                     
            Application 10/083,492                                                                           

                   under 35 USC 112, paragraph six, as invoked by Applicants on page 12 of                   
                   the amendment filed April 17, 2003.                                                       
                         Paragraphs 0039-0044 of the specification disclose a means for                      
                   retaining the screws on the plate including the diameter of the threaded                  
                   portion of the screw being substantially equal to the diameter of the                     
                   corresponding hole in the plate. However, this means would only connect the               
                   plate to the disk when the base is not affixed to the sports apparatus if the             
                   plate is disposed beneath the base or disk. If the plate were disposed above              
                   the base or disk, this means would only retain the screws on the plate and                
                   would not connect the plate to the disk. Thus, the claims are unclear as to               
                   whether the means includes the screw diameter at the threaded portion                     
                   relative to the diameter of the hole in the plate alone or the screw diameter at          
                   the threaded portion relative to the diameter of the hole in the plate in                 
                   combination with the location of the plate being below the base or disk.                  
                         In section B. 3. of the remarks to the amendment filed August 18,                   
                   2003, Applicants indicate that the limitations in which the plate is disposed             
                   in the lower surface of the base or disk are only present in dependent claims.            
                   Since the means plus function limitation in question appears in independent               
                   claims 6 and 38, for the purposes of examination the means have been                      
                   interpreted as being the screw diameter at the threaded portion relative to the           
                   diameter of the hole in the plate alone without locating the plate below the              
                   base or disk. This means would connect the plate to the disk when the base                
                   is not affixed to the sports apparatus to the same extent as the claimed.                 
            Answer 4-5. Emphasis added.                                                                      
            2. The Examiner concedes that the claim 6 defines means for retaining the                        
            screws on the plate and for connecting the plate to the disk when the base is not                
            affixed to the sports apparatus.                                                                 
            3. However, the Examiner queries whether the breadth of the means language                       
            is such that the claim encompasses an inoperative embodiment, i.e., whereby the                  
            screws would not connect the plate to the disk when the base is not affixed to the               
            sports apparatus, or is limited to an embodiment wherein the plate is disposed                   





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013