onecle

Ex Parte Marion et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                            
                                    is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     
                                                                                                              

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                 __________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                 __________                                                    
                     Ex parte NEAL RICHARD MARION, GEORGE F. RAMSAY III,                                       
                                     and JAMES STANLEY TESAURO                                                 
                                                 __________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-1471                                                 
                                           Application 10/402,110                                              
                                          Technology Center 2600                                               
                                                 __________                                                    
                                          Decided: August 7, 2007                                              
                                                 __________                                                    
                Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and                                                   
                ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
                COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        
                               ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER                                                 
                      We note that Appellants have introduced a new argument in the Reply                      
                Brief.  Specifically, Appellants argue that the Aschenbrenner reference (U.S.                  
                Pat. 5,406,310) does not disclose the recited limitation “wherein dynamic                      
                sizing of color tables occurs” (See independent claims 1, 8, and 14; see also                  
                Reply Brief 3).                                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013