The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CAROL LYNDALL COLRAIN and DAVID BROWER
____________
Appeal 2007-1476
Application 10/308,866
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: July 24, 2007
____________
Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JAY P. LUCAS, and MARC S. HOFF,
Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Colrain and Brower (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 1 through 4, 6, 9 through 35, 37,
and 40 through 48, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates generally to resource management of
networked systems. (See Specification 2.) Claim 1 is illustrative of the
claimed invention, and it reads as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013