onecle

Ex Parte Schmidl et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board                                    
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                         ____________________                                               
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                         ____________________                                               
                        Ex parte TIMOTHY M. SCHMIDL, ANAND G. DABAK,                                        
                             MOHAMMED NAFIE, and ALAN GATHERER                                              
                                         ____________________                                               
                                            Appeal 2007-1481                                                
                                         Application 09/915,0911                                            
                                         Technology Center 2600                                             
                                         ____________________                                               
                                         Decided: August 6, 2007                                            
                                         ____________________                                               
               Before:  JOSEPH L. DIXON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and MARC                                    
               S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
               HOFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                                         STATEMENT OF CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of                     
               claims 1-3 and 5-322.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                          
                                                                                                           
               1 Application filed July 25, 2001.  The application claims priority under 35                 
               U.S.C.  119(e) from Provisional Application No. 60/231,652, filed                           
               September 11, 2000.  The real party in interest is Texas Instruments, Inc.                   
               2 Claim 4 has been canceled.                                                                 



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013