Ex Parte Kocev et al - Page 1

                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                   
                  Ex parte ANDREJ KOCEV, SAMUEL H. DUNCAN, and STEVEN HO                                     
                                              ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1498                                                
                                          Application 09/944,776                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                              ____________                                                   
                                        Decided: September 7, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                   
                Before ROBERT E. NAPPI, JEAN R. HOMERE, and                                                  
                ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
                HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         
                              ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER                                                

                                     I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final                      
                Rejection of claims 13 through 36, 40, and 41.  Claims 37 through 39 have                    
                been allowed.  Claims 1 through 12 have been cancelled.  We have                             
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.                                   








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013