onecle

Ex Parte Feng - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                   
                                           precedent of the Board.                                            
                                                                                                             
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                              _____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                              _____________                                                   
                                            Ex parte AN FENG1                                                 
                                              _____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1505                                                 
                                           Application 10/279,481                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                              
                                              ______________                                                  
                                           Decided: July 27, 2007                                             
                                             _______________                                                  
                Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,                                  
                ALLEN R. MacDONALD, and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent                                
                Judges.                                                                                       
                NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
                                                                                                             
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  6(b) of the Final                        
                Rejection of claims 1 through 9, 11, 16, and 17, claims 12 through 15 are                     
                objected to and claims 10 and 18 have been canceled.  Appellant has                           
                                                                                                              
                1  We note that declaration and official filing receipt identify the inventor as              
                An Feng, however Appellant’s Brief and Reply Brief, both identify the                         
                inventor as Andrew Feng.                                                                      



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013