The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JULES S. COHEN, PAUL K. KROMANN, and
THOMAS S. REEVE
____________
Appeal 2007-1539
Application 09/741,362
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: June 28, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and
JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of
claims 1-4, 6-12, 14-16, 18-21, 24-26, and 28. Claims 5, 13, 17, 22, 23, and
27 have been canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We reverse.
Appellants’ invention relates to a system and method for execution of
live content usage experiments in which an assigned unique identification
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013