UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte OLAF ABELS and KLAUS BRÖKER
____________
Appeal 2007-1549
Application 10/632,017
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: October 31, 2007
____________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, JENNIFER D. BAHR and
ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Olaf Abels et al. (Appellants) originally appealed under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134 from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 5, 9-10, 12, 14, 17,
20, 23 and 28-31. The Examiner withdrew the rejection of claim 28 (Ans.
3). Accordingly, only claims 1, 5, 9-10, 12, 14, 17, 20, 23 and 29-31 are
involved in this appeal. Claim 28 now stands objected to by the Examiner
(Ans. 2). Claims 2-4, 6-8, 11, 13, 16, 18, 19, 21 and 22 have been
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013