onecle

Ex Parte Zehner et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not                          
                                  binding precedent of the Board.                                            

                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                           ____________                                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                           ____________                                                      
                                 Ex parte GEORGIA L. ZEHNER                                                  
                                  and DUANE G. UITENBROEK                                                    
                                           ____________                                                      
                                         Appeal 2007-1560                                                    
                                      Application 10/680,968                                                 
                                      Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                           ____________                                                      
                                     Decided:  August 21, 2007                                               
                                           ____________                                                      
                Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and                                                  
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                                       Statement of the Case                                                 
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection                         
                of claims 1-31.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6.                                   
                      Appellants’ invention relates to liner composites suitable for                         
                incorporation into disposable absorbent articles.  An understanding                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013