Appeal 2007-1562
Application 10/865,666
in a particular reference.’”); In re Hoeschele, 406 F.2d 1403, 1406-07,
160 USPQ 809, 811-812 (CCPA 1969) (“[I]t is proper to take into account
not only specific teachings of the references but also the inferences which
one skilled in the art would reasonably be expected to draw therefrom . . .”).
As a final point with respect to the § 103 rejection, we note that Appellant
bases no argument upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as
unexpected results.
For the foregoing reasons and those presented in the Answer, we
affirm the rejection.
ORDER
The Examiner's decision rejecting claims 11-14 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
sld
MARTHA ANN FINNEGAN, ESQ.
CABOT CORPORATION
157 CONCORD ROAD
BILLERICA, MA 01821-7001
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013