Ex Parte Addiego et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                     Ex parte WILLIAM P. ADDIEGO                                             
                                   and CHARLES M. SORENSEN, JR.                                              
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1564                                                
                                          Application 10/611,508                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 27, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                               
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the Examiner’s                         
                decision rejecting claims 1-19.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                
                      We REVERSE.                                                                            








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013