Ex Parte Fokken et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written             
                             for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                __________                                                   
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                   
                           Ex parte STEFAN FOKKEN and WALTHER REITH                                          
                                                __________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1565                                                
                                          Application 10/682,951                                             
                                         Technology Center 1700                                              
                                                __________                                                   
                                         DECIDED: May 16, 2007                                               
                                                __________                                                   

                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and                                                    
                RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-5.  We               
                have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  We affirm.                                        

                                         STATEMENT OF CASE                                                   
                      The claimed invention relates to a composition for stabilizing halogen                 
                containing polymers (Specification 3).  Claims 1-5, all the pending claims,                  
                stand rejected over prior art (Br. 1).  The Examiner relies on the following                 
                evidence of unpatentability:                                                                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013