Ex Parte Stanley - Page 4

            Appeal 2007-1576                                                                                 
            Application 10/020,398                                                                           

            information in the first processor’s cache to display an image, and to retrieve the              
            second information from the local processor’s cache.  Maddalozzo teaches a                       
            system whereby a first processor checks to see if a requested file is in its local               
            cache.  See step 112, figure 5A, and col. 9, ll. 15-21.  If the file is in local cache,          
            the processor then establishes the timestamp and check sum for the file and queries              
            other processors in the network to determine if they have a newer version of the                 
            file.  See step 118 of figure 5A and col. 10, ll. 11-13.  If the other processors do not         
            have a newer version of the file they provide information to the first processor                 
            indicating that they do not have a newer file.  See step 118 of figure 5A, and sub               
            step 128 of figure 5B, and col. 10, ll. 17-20, 55-58.  We consider claimed first                 
            information to be taught by Maddalozzo’s teaching of sending information from                    
            the second processor that it does not have a newer version of the file.  Maddalozzo              
            teaches that based upon receipt of this information, the first processor retrieves the           
            file (second information) from local cache.  See step 135.                                       
                   Appellant also argues on page 10 of the Brief:                                            
                         [N]othing here [referring to Delaney and Maddalozzo] teaches what is                
                   claimed which is received first information from the second processor-based               
                   system.  In other words, the one that would send it sends information to                  
                   avoid having to send the information.                                                     
            Appellant makes a similar argument on page 2 of the Reply Brief.                                 
                   We are not persuaded by these arguments.  Initially, we note that                         
            independent claim 1 does not recite that the second processor sends first                        
            information so that it does not have to send second information as implied by                    
            Appellant’s arguments.  Nonetheless, as discussed supra, Maddalozzo teaches that                 
            a second processor sends first information identifying if the file (second                       
            information) in the first processor’s cache is current.  If so identified, the skilled           

                                                     4                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013