onecle

Ex Parte Kilby et al - Page 1



             1                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                       
             2                       today is not binding precedent of the Board                                           
             3                                                                                                             
             4                                                                                                             
             5                                                                                                             
             6             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
             7                                 ____________________                                                        
             8                                                                                                             
             9                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
           10                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
           11                                  ____________________                                                        
           12                                                                                                              
           13            Ex parte LEONARD R. KILBY, JOHN M. LUCIDO, JOHN D.                                                
           14                         LEATHERBEE, and JAMES J. DIVER                                                       
           15                                  ____________________                                                        
           16                                                                                                              
           17                                     Appeal  2007-1581                                                        
           18                                   Application 10/670113                                                      
           19                                  Technology Center 3700                                                      
           20                                  ____________________                                                        
           21                                                                                                              
           22                               Decided: September 25, 2007                                                    
           23                                  ____________________                                                        
           24                                                                                                              
           25     Before: WILLIAM F. PATE, III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and DAVID                                             
           26     B. WALKER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 
           27                                                                                                              
           28     CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   
           29                                                                                                              
           30                                                                                                              
           31                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
           32                                                                                                              
           33                                  STATEMENT OF CASE                                                           
           34            Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 (2002) from a final rejection                             
           35     of claims 63 and 64.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b) (2002).                                
           36     This case was heard by this panel of the Board on September 13, 2007.                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013