onecle

Ex Parte Taylor - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                              
                             for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                           Ex parte STEVE B. TAYLOR                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                                  Appeal 2007-1594                                                         
                                               Application 10/600,379                                                      
                                               Technology Center 3600                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                               Decided:  June 22, 2007                                                     
                                                     ____________                                                          
              Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and STUART S. LEVY,                                             
              Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                
              PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      


                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                                           STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                           
                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-22.  These are all the                         
              claims remaining in the application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  134.                            







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013