The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ALBERT M. FLEISCHNER
__________
Appeal 2007-1615
Application 10/693,442
Technology Center 1600
__________
DECIDED: September 27, 2007
__________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and ERIC GRIMES,
Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 7, 35, and 36. The Examiner has rejected the claims as
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).1 We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
1 Written description and enablement rejections of the claims under the first
paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 have been withdrawn (Answer 4).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013