onecle

Ex Parte Wisniewski et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                    
                                   Ex parte RICHARD WISNIEWSKI and                                              
                                         LEONIDAS C. LEONARD                                                    
                                                ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-1673                                                  
                                           Application 10/056,237                                               
                                           Technology Center 3700                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                                           Decided:  April 30, 2007                                             
                                                ____________                                                    
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and CHUNG K.                                        
                PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                              
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-8 and 27-42.                      
                Claims 9-26 stand withdrawn from consideration.  Claim  1 is illustrative:                      
                       1.  A method of preserving a biopharmaceutical product in a vessel                       
                having an interior cavity defined by at least an interior wall of said vessel;                  
                       actively cooling said interior wall using a fluid;                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013