onecle

Ex Parte Maza et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                     Ex parte AURELIA MAZA, THADDEUS RUSSELL ZIEGERT,                                        
                                          JAMES D. BENSEMA,                                                  
                                   and CHRISTOPHER E. LANGBEIN                                               
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1678                                                
                                          Application 09/800,547                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 30, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and                                                
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the Examiner’s                         
                decision rejecting claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8-11, 13-16, 18-26, 28, and 29.  This is               
                the second appeal in this case (see Decision mailed September 30, 2004).                     
                We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013