The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AURELIA MAZA, THADDEUS RUSSELL ZIEGERT,
JAMES D. BENSEMA,
and CHRISTOPHER E. LANGBEIN
____________
Appeal 2007-1678
Application 09/800,547
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: July 30, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8-11, 13-16, 18-26, 28, and 29. This is
the second appeal in this case (see Decision mailed September 30, 2004).
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013