Ex Parte Vaneeckhoutte et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1679                                                                             
                Application 11/041,470                                                                       

                      The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of                       
                obviousness:                                                                                 
                Suzuki                    US 4,211,823             Jul. 8, 1980                              
                Fujioka                 US 4,405,679              Sep. 20, 1983                             
                      Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a hardenable composition                  
                consisting essentially of a hydrolysate of a silane containing an epoxy group                
                and three alkoxy groups, a hydrolysate of a silane of recited Formula (I),                   
                colloidal silica and an aluminum compound, such as an aluminum chelate.                      
                The hydrolysate of a silane of Formula (I) comprises 8-16% by weight of the                  
                theoretical dry content of the composition.  The hardenable composition can                  
                be used to form an abrasion resistant coating on, for example, an ophthalmic                 
                lens substrate.                                                                              
                      Appealed claims 8-47 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                        
                being unpatentable over Fujioka in view of Suzuki.                                           
                      We have thoroughly reviewed each of Appellants' arguments for                          
                patentability.  However, we find ourselves in complete agreement with the                    
                Examiner's reasoned analysis and application of the prior art, as well as his                
                cogent and thorough disposition of the arguments raised by Appellants.                       
                Accordingly, we will adopt the Examiner's reasoning as our own in                            
                sustaining the rejection of record, and we add the following for emphasis                    
                only.                                                                                        
                      There is apparently no dispute that Fujioka, like Appellants, discloses                
                a hardenable, abrasion resistant coating that may comprise the presently                     
                claimed hydrolysate of a silane containing an epoxy group and three alkoxy                   
                groups, such as γ-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane, a hydrolysate of a silane                 
                in accordance with Appellants' Formula (I), such as dimethyldiethoxysilane,                  

                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013