Ex Parte Tanigawa et al - Page 2

              Appeal 2007-1680                                                                               
              Application 10/081,087                                                                         

              I.    APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER                                                                  
                    The subject matter on appeal is directed to a positive electrode material                
              for use in alkaline storage batteries, containing nickel hydroxide and/or nickel               
              oxyhydroxide powder.  Details of the appealed subject matter are recited in                    
              representative claim 11 reproduced below:                                                      
                    1. A positive electrode active material for an alkaline storage battery                  
              comprising: at least one selected from the group consisting of a nickel                        
              hydroxide powder and a nickel oxyhydroxide powder,                                             
                    (1) wherein said positive electrode active material has a mean particle                  
              circularity from greater than 0.95 to less than 1 as determined by a particle                  
              image analysis with a flat sheath flow utilizing hydrodynamics and wherein                     
              the number of particles having a circularity of not larger than 0.85 accounts                  
              for not more than 5% of the number of total particles within said positive                     
              electrode material,                                                                            
                    (2) said positive electrode material has a mean particle size from not                   
              smaller than 5 µm to not larger than 20 µm on a volume basis,                                  
                    (3) said positive electrode active material has a specific surface area                  
              from not smaller than 5 m2/g to not larger than 20 m2/g, and                                   
                    (4) at least said nickel hydroxide powder has an X-ray diffraction                       
              pattern where a full width at half maximum of a peak attributed to (101) face                  
              is from not less than 0.7 deg/2θ to not more than 1.2 deg/2θ and a ratio of a                  
              peak intensity of a peak attributed to (001) face to a peak intensity of a peak                
              attributed to (101) face is not less than 1.1.                                                 

                                                                                                            

                                                                                                            
              1  The Appellants do not separately argue the individual claims on appeal                      
              (Br.5-15).  Therefore, for purposes of this appeal, we decide the propriety of                 
              the Examiner’s rejections based on claim 1 alone consistent with 37 C.F.R.                     
              § 41.37(C)(1)(vii)(2006).                                                                      
                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013