onecle

Ex Parte Motohashi - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
                                is not binding precedent of the Board                              
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                        _______________                                            
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                        _______________                                            
                                Ex parte KAZUNARI MOTOHASHI                                        
                                         ______________                                            
                                        Appeal 2007-1681                                           
                                      Application 10/613,371                                       
                                      Technology Center 1700                                       
                                        _______________                                            
                                     Decided:  August 31, 2007                                     
                                        _______________                                            
              Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                        
              CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
              WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                 

                           ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER                                         
                    Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary                
              Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 3 in the Office Action mailed            
              May 26, 2006 (Office Action).  35 U.S.C.  6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R.           
               41.31(a) (2006).                                                                   
                    We remand the application to the Examiner for consideration and                
              explanation of issues raised by the record.  37 C.F.R. 41.50(a)(1) (2007);          






Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013