Ex Parte Chong - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1685                                                                             
                Application 10/106,402                                                                       
                      Appellant's invention relates to a method for processing porkhide dog                  
                chews.  Independent claim 1 is illustrative:                                                 
                            1. A method of processing porkhide dog chews, comprising                         
                      the following steps:                                                                   
                            subjecting pigskin rawhide to defatting and depilation                           
                      treatment;                                                                             
                            splitting the rawhide into a plurality of layers of split rawhide                
                      material;                                                                              
                            subjecting the split rawhide material to shaping and drying to                   
                      produce a shaped hide product; and                                                     
                            smoking the shaped hide product with gaseous smoke to dye                        
                      and flavor the shaped hide product, resulting in a finished porkhide                   
                      dog chew.                                                                              
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                      
                unpatentability:                                                                             
                Meyer US 4,163,804 Aug. 7, 1979                                                              
                Lynch  US 6,033,715 Mar. 7, 2000                                                             
                Wenzhou Huaheng Plastics & Leather Co. Standard Q/NHH 01-2001                                
                (2/6/01)                                                                                     
                A.D. Livingston, Cold-Smoking & Salt-Curing Meat, Fish, & Game, 43-47                        
                & 83-112, (1995)                                                                             
                Appellant’s Admitted Prior Art (“AAPA”), Specification 1-2                                   
                      The Examiner made the following rejections:                                            
                      1.  Claims 1, 6, 11-20, and 25-33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                          
                unpatentable over AAPA in view of Wenzhou and as evidenced by Lynch;                         
                      2.  Claims 1, 6, 11-20, and 25-33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                          
                unpatentable over AAPA in view of Meyer and as evidenced by Lynch;                           



                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013