Appeal 2007-1720
Application 09/148,832
an attribute for the transaction and a reference to the scope of the data to be used
for the transaction.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
We conclude that Appellants have failed to show that the Examiner erred in
rejecting claims 2-52 as anticipated by Ginter.
DECISION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 2-52 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
vsh
ARENT FOX PLLC
1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W.
SUITE 400
WASHINGTON DC 20036
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013