Ex Parte Shim et al - Page 2

                  Appeal 2007-1727                                                                                           
                  Application 10/836,916                                                                                     

                         Appellants' invention relates to a heat spreader for thermally enhanced                             
                  semiconductor packages.  See generally Specification 1:4-6.  Claim 1 is                                    
                  illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                            
                  1.     An electronic device comprising:                                                                    
                  a substrate carrier;                                                                                       
                  a semiconductor connected to the substrate carrier;                                                        
                  a heat spreader having a body portion with a perimeter, a lower surface, and                               
                         a number of legs formed from the body portion of the heat spreader,                                 
                         interior to the perimeter of the body portion, recessed below the body                              
                         portion, and attached to the substrate carrier, wherein:                                            
                  the distance between the substrate carrier and the lower surface of the body                               
                         portion of the heat spreader defines a Z-dimension; and                                             
                  the Z-dimension is maintained constant over substantially the entire surface                               
                         area of the body portion of the heat spreader except proximate the                                  
                         legs.                                                                                               
                         The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in                                   
                  rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                         
                  Houle                      US 6,469,381 B1             Oct. 22, 2002                                       
                  Appellants' Admitted Prior Art (AAPA)                                                                      
                         Claims 1, 3, 4, 6 through 8, 11 through 14, and 18 through 20 stand                                 
                  rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.                                     
                         Claims 1, 3, 4, 6 through 8, 11 through 14, and 18 through 20 stand                                 
                  rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Houle .                                          
                         Claims 5 and 11 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                  
                  being unpatentable over Houle in view of AAPA.                                                             

                                                             2                                                               

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013