Ex Parte Lim et al - Page 3

                  Appeal 2007-1731                                                                                           
                  Application 10/796,051                                                                                     
                         link means between said client and a server, whereby activation of                                  
                  said help button retrieves help information relating to subject matter                                     
                  displayed on said content frame window from said server.                                                   


                         27.  A system for storing information respecting a plurality of                                     
                  applications to a shared memory comprising:                                                                
                         a volatile memory for storing said information;                                                     
                         means to allocate space in said volatile memory to selected ones of                                 
                  said plurality of applications;                                                                            
                         identification means for identifying said space allocated to each of                                
                  said selected applications;                                                                                
                         backup means to periodically transfer stored information from said                                  
                  volatile memory to non-volatile memory; and                                                                
                         means to retrieve information from said non-volatile memory at                                      
                  system startup.                                                                                            
                         The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                                   
                  unpatentability:                                                                                           
                         Hu   US 5,586,260   Dec. 17, 1996                                                                   
                         Baker   US 5,678,041   Oct. 14, 1997                                                                
                         LaStrange  US 5,784,058   Jul.  21, 1998                                                            
                         Davis   US 5,796,952   Aug. 18, 1998                                                                
                         The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                                         
                      1. Claims 7-12, 39, and 40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as                                     
                         unpatentable over Baker and Hu.                                                                     
                      2. Claims 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as                                            
                         unpatentable over LaStrange.                                                                        


                                                             3                                                               

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013