onecle

Ex Parte Ilic - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Ex parte KOSTA ILIC                                                
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1740                                                
                                          Application 09/726,776                                             
                                          Technology Center 2600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 24, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and JEAN R.                                      
                HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
                RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner’s                            
                rejection of claims 1-31.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                      
                      We affirm-in-part.                                                                     
                      Appellant’s claimed invention relates to the magnification of a display                
                of a signal waveform in which a virtual magnification symbol is positioned                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013