Ex Parte Dilley et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                  
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ____________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          ____________                                             
                                   Ex parte ROLAND DILLEY,                                         
                         RICHARD PAUL BELDAM and WILLI J. SMITH                                    
                                          ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-1750                                          
                                      Application 11/057,917                                       
                                     Technology Center 3700                                        
                                          ____________                                             
                                     Decided: August 29, 2007                                      
                                          ____________                                             

              Before WILLIAM F. PATE III, ANTON FETTING, and                                       
              JOSEPH FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
              WILLIAM F. PATE III, Administrative Patent Judge.                                    

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            

                                     STATEMENT OF CASE                                             
                    This is an appeal from the Examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1-7, 9,          
              20 and 21 as amended after Final Rejection.  Claim 8 has been cancelled.             
              Claims 10-19 and 22 stand withdrawn from consideration.  We have                     
              jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 and 134.                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013