onecle

Ex Parte Lindskog et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding          
                                      precedent of the Board.                                      

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ____________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          ____________                                             
               Ex parte JAN LINDSKOG, GUNNAR RYDNELL, and PER GRAPATIN                             
                                          ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-1758                                          
                                      Application 10/004,786                                       
                                     Technology Center 2600                                        
                                          ____________                                             
                                     Decided: August 30, 2007                                      
                                          ____________                                             


              Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and JOHN A.                            
              JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
              RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                               

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                                   STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                           
                    Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Final Rejection of            
              claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10-16, and 18-25.  Claims 2, 4, 6, 9, and 17 have been         
              canceled.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                              
                    We reverse.                                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013