Ex Parte Cote et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
                                is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ____________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          ____________                                             
                   Ex parte PIERRE COTE, HAMID RABIE, NICHOLAS ADAMS,                              
                HIDAYAT HUSAIN, HENRY BEHMANN, STEVEN PEDERSEN, and                                
                                         JASON CADERA                                              
                                          ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-1768                                          
                                      Application 10/377,647                                       
                                     Technology Center 1700                                        
                                          ____________                                             
                                     Decided: August 27, 2007                                      
                                          ____________                                             

              Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                          
              JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
              SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                  

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of              
              claims 16-25.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6.                             








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013