Appeal 2007-1779
Application 10/447,351
CONCLUSION OF LAW
In the obviousness rejection, the Examiner used impermissible
hindsight reconstruction to pick and choose among disclosures in the applied
prior art references. Obviousness has not been established by the Examiner
because the applied references neither teach nor would have suggested to the
skilled artisan all of the method steps and apparatus limitations.
DECISION
The obviousness rejection of claims 5 to 16 is reversed.
REVERSED
KIS
DILLON & YUDELL, L.L.P.
8911 N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY
SUITE 2110
AUSTIN, TX 78759
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013