Ex Parte Gentry et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                    Ex parte MATTHEW C. GENTRY                                               
                                         AND KEITH W. HOVIS                                                  
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1801                                                
                                          Application 10/156,917                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 30, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and                                              
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 14-21                  
                and 45-50, the only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction                
                over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013