onecle

Ex Parte Sonoda - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding          
                                      precedent of the Board.                                      

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ____________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          ____________                                             
                                  Ex parte FUMIHIRO SONODA                                         
                                          ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-1809                                          
                                      Application 09/774,013                                       
                                     Technology Center 2600                                        
                                          ____________                                             
                                    Decided: September 26, 2007                                    
                                          ____________                                             

              Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and                                         
              JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
              JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                


                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner’s                    
              rejection of claims 1-22.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  We          
              affirm.                                                                              








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013