onecle

Ex Parte Nozik et al - Page 1



                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                      
                                      is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                __________                                                   
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                   
                                 Ex parte  MARCIA GROSSMAN NOZIK                                             
                                    and RANDY GROSSMAN NOZIK                                                 
                                                __________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1812                                                
                                          Application 10/759,713                                             
                                          Technology Center 3700                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                                           Decided July 13, 2007                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and LORA M. GREEN,                                     
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 involving claims to a sling                    
                holder.  The Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated or obvious.  We                 
                have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  We affirm.                                        
                                             BACKGROUND                                                      
                      The Specification describes “a sling holder that when assembled can                    
                be secured around a body part to hold an object thereto.  The sling holder                   
                comprises a strap having first and second ends and a fastener for securing                   



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013