The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MATTHEW A. HAYDUK and CHUN-XIANG HE
____________
Appeal 2007-1842
Application 09/948,889
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Hayduk and He (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 7, 9 through 14, and 16 through 25,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013