Ex Parte Hayduk et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                           precedent of the Board.                                           

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                                ____________                                                 
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                ____________                                                 
                         Ex parte MATTHEW A. HAYDUK and CHUN-XIANG HE                                        
                                                ____________                                                 
                                              Appeal 2007-1842                                               
                                           Application 09/948,889                                            
                                           Technology Center 2600                                            
                                                ____________                                                 
                                           Decided:  July 31, 2007                                           
                                                ____________                                                 
                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and                                             
                HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
                GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      Hayduk and He (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                       
                Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 7, 9 through 14, and 16 through 25,                     
                which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013