onecle

Ex Parte Becker et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                           

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                            Ex parte MICHAEL BECKER, FRANK BAHREN,                                          
                                       and ANDREAS STIEGLER                                                 
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-1844                                                
                                          Application 10/012,200                                            
                                         Technology Center 2600                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: October 4, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, JEAN R. HOMERE, and                                              
               ST JOHN COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
               HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                 
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner’s Final                     
               Rejection of claims 1 through 14.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                      
                6(b) to decide this appeal.  We reverse.                                                   






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013