Appeal 2007-1870
Application 10/688,449
dependent claims 2-5, 7-10, and 12-15. As such, these claims fall with their
respective independent claims 1, 6, and 11. 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (2006).
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
We conclude that Appellant has not shown that the Examiner erred in
finding claim 1-15 unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the combination of
Bond and Ohno.
DECISION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-15 is AFFIRMED.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
hh
Cook, Alex, McFarron,
Manzo, Cummings & Mehler, Ltd.
Suite 2850
200 West Adams Street
Chicago, IL 60606
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: September 9, 2013