onecle

Ex Parte Lu et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered                               
                                 today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                               Ex parte JENNIFER LU, NICOLAS J. MOLL,                                          
                                         and THOMAS E. KOPLEY                                                  
                                               ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-1893                                                 
                                           Application 10/946,753                                              
                                          Technology Center 2800                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                         Decided: September 5, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                    

                Before JEAN R. HOMERE, JAY P. LUCAS, and JOHN A. JEFFERY,                                      
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                  
                JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner’s                              
                rejection of claims 1, 3-16, 25-37, and 39-43.  We have jurisdiction under 35                  
                U.S.C.  6(b).  We affirm-in-part.  Also, we enter new grounds of rejection                    
                under 37 C.F.R.  41.50(b) for claims 7 and 30-32.                                             






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013