onecle

Ex Parte Elliott - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                            
                                    is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                                        Ex parte JERRY E. ELLIOTT                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-1909                                                 
                                           Application 10/608,290                                              
                                          Technology Center 3600                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                        Decided:  September 7, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                    
             Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J, OWENS, and LINDA E. HORNER,                                 
             Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                     
             HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013