Appeal 2007-1913
Application 10/299,661
combine the teachings of Perl and Ammarell “for further facilitating holding the
bottle between a user’s fingers” (Answer 4).
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that Appellant has not shown that the Examiner erred in
rejecting claims 1-119 and 149-156 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
DECISION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-119 and 149-156 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
hh
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER
LLP
901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: September 9, 2013