Appeal 2007-1932
Application 11/066,550
wherein the patterned printing side [1] includes a hydrophobic
interface, the substrate [7] includes a hydrophilic interface and
the printing medium [6, 8, 9] is hydrophilic.
Figure 1 from the specification is shown below:
{Figure 1 is said to illustrate the claimed process.}2
The Examiner has relied on the following prior art as evidence of
unpatentability:
Okazaki EP 0,402,902 Dec. 19 1990
Duthaler US 6,504,438 B2 Jan. 14 2003
Teng US 6,745,693 B2 Jun. 8 2004
Choy US 6,821,329 B2 Nov. 23 2004
B. Findings of Fact
2 The text in curly braces following the Figures is provided to ensure
compliance with section 508 of the U.S. Rehabilitation Act for publication
of this decision on the USPTO website pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act. It is not part of the decision.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013