The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte LAWRENCE W. HRUBESH
____________________
Appeal No. 2007-1938
Application No. 10/050,4371
Technology Center 1700
____________________
Decided: August 10, 2007
____________________
Before RICHARD TORCZON, CAROL A. SPIEGEL and
MARK NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. Introduction
Lawrence W. Hrubesh (hereinafter "Appellant") seeks our review
under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 4, 8 and
1 The application on appeal was filed 15 January 2002. The real parties-in-
interest are said to be the Regents of the University of California and the
United States of America as represented by the United States Department of
Energy.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013