This opinion is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CORNING INCORPORATED
____________
Appeal 2007-1939
Application 10/277,563
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: June 13, 2007
____________
Before JAMESON LEE, RICHARD TORCZON, and SALLY G. LANE,
Administrative Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The claimed invention generally relates to a solid-oxide fuel cell
(SOFC). The examiner contends claims 12 and 34-39 have been anticipated
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). The appellant (Corning) disagrees. We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013