The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte OLIVER DERNOVSEK,
MARKUS EBERSTEIN, WOLFGANG GUTHER, CHRISTINA MODES,
GABRIELE PREU, WOLFGANG ARNO SCHILLER,
BARBEL SCHULZ, and WOLFRAM WERSING
______________
Appeal 2007-1940
Application 10/362,942
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: August 30, 2007
_______________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 21 through 36 and 38 through 40 in the
Office Action mailed April 3, 2006. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002);
37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2006).
We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013