Ex Parte Baumeister et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1955                                                                             
                Application 09/841,965                                                                       
                      Appellants’ claimed invention relates to a network system for                          
                dynamically determining a user’s access rights to an access controlled                       
                object.  A software system filter is utilized to evaluate user access rights to              
                the access controlled object based on data not available until the time of                   
                access.  The filter also evaluates additional data which occurs while the user               
                has access to the access controlled object and monitors any change in the                    
                access rights which cause withdrawal of the access rights to the access                      
                controlled object.  (Specification 1-2).                                                     
                      Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and it reads as follows:                      
                1. A network, comprising:                                                                    
                terminals;                                                                                   
                a software system distributed over all the terminals; and                                    
                at least one access controlled object,                                                       
                wherein the software system includes at least a filter which evaluates                       
                access rights of a user for the access controlled object based on data which                 
                are not available until the time of access, the filter further evaluating                    
                additional data occurring while the user has access to the access control                    
                object, monitoring a change in the access rights, and triggering withdrawal                  
                of the access rights to the access controlled object.                                        
                                                                                                            
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                      
                unpatentability:                                                                             
                Brown   US 5,941,947   Aug. 24, 1999                                                         
                Peterka   WO 99/66714 A1   Dec. 23, 1999                                                     
                      Claims 1, 3, 4, and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as being                 
                anticipated by Peterka.  Claims 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                       
                § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Peterka in view of Brown.                                

                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013